morrisj wrote:Is e4xt better or worse than the e6400 ultra in any way? The one thing stopping me would be loosing the cf card reader option and therefore not being able to import wav's.
But then i saw this YouTube video of someone using a cf card reader in an e6400 (not ultra) running eos 4.62 and successfully importing a wav file:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OZ-44kIy-c0how is this possible? i was under the impression eos 4.7 was needed for this, and this only works on ultra's.
It's all a bit confusing. i'm just after an emu with ascii option that can also read wav files.
1 better or worse?.... The Ultra is better as it has a much faster chipset (coldfire processor). Cord setup allows for it be controlled by 12 continuous controllers.It will handle IDE drives up-to 120gb formatted in FAT with EOS 4.7, plus resonance will tweak in real time with 4.7.
The one great thing with the e4xt is the ASCII port, I love this feature on my sampler as it makes preset creation, page navigation and name/ number input much easier, but the non ultra sampler is more likely to respond sluggishly when running from your DAW on multiple midi channels.
2 YouTube video how is this possible?.....the guy in the video has his card reader in EOS format not FAT and he has it hooked up to the samplers scsi board, however the card he is writing to will not be readable on a PC as it is not FAT format. So this setup will
not allow the info stored on the card to be moved to or from the PC for sample transfer or archiving presets/banks by simply slotting the card into the PC.
In my opinion I would prefer the ultra but be on the lookout for an ultra with ASCII and move up to this when you find one for the right price, or fit a ASCII port if you can find one.
However if the e4xt is really cheap you could buy it and use it for bank creation then transfer the banks to and from the ultra with a scsi zip disc, you would then have most of the editing done with ASCII and maybe just need to do a few tweaks inside the ultra. This option would also give you loads more audio outputs and voices.
Although 2 samplers might sound excessive just think how easy it is to swallow up polyphony when creating sounds.
Example..... I often stack four copies of stereo samples, add detune and offset s/start points to get an nice analogue synth, now if you play this as a four note cord you have used up ......4 x 2 x 4 =
32 notes (but what an organic thick sound)
If you run 2 of these on a 64 voice sampler
you are out of notes! And you haven't started on the drum track yet!!
So maybe it's worth considering 2 samplers